Coding agents

Claude Duet, OpenAI Dots or Grok Bot: comparing the always-on agents

Three agents that work in the background on a cloud computer, compared on vendor, model, connectors, safeguards, price and availability in France, from a developer's point of view.

By ·

In less than three months, three vendors have launched an agent that no longer just answers: it has its own computer in the cloud, watches your apps, works while you are away and comes to you for important decisions. Grok Bot arrived on August 11, 2026, OpenAI Dots on September 29 and Anthropic's Claude Duet on October 21. Meta is also in the race with Muse, an agent aimed more at consumers, which we leave aside here (Trending Topics).

For readers in France, availability is often the deciding factor. Claude Duet is US-only; Dots excludes the EEA for Pro subscribers, but not for Business Premium seats; Grok Bot publishes no country list, but its computers run in the US. Details below.

The comparison table

The comparison table
CriterionClaude DuetOpenAI DotsGrok Bot
VendorAnthropicOpenAISpaceXSI (formerly xAI, legal entity SpaceXAI LLC); product run by Cursor, a SpaceX subsidiary
LaunchOct 21, 2026, research previewSept 29, 2026, gradual rolloutAug 11, 2026, beta
ModelClaude Opus 5.5, cannot be changedGPT-6 AstraPicked per task: xAI or third-party models (including Claude Opus 5.5), no picker
Where to use itiOS and Android app, claude.aiChatGPT (desktop, web, mobile), Slack, Teams; texting in a limited US betamacOS, Windows, Linux, iOS, Android apps; Slack (team bots); X (@bot)
Cloud computerOne virtual machine with its own browserOne cloud computer per dot; optional access to your computerOne computer shared by all bots on the account (one screen per bot)
Number of agentsOne agent, several channelsOne primary dot for nowSeveral bots in parallel (about 50 per account)
ConnectorsOver 6,000 connectors and pluginsOver 4,000 apps through plugins"Connect apps" plugins (GitHub, Google Workspace, Microsoft 365…) plus computer use
SafeguardsApproval before sending, paying, signing, deleting; securities trading and transfers blockedBuilt-in rules and Custom Rules; auto-review; read-only proactive researchAuto Review (independent review model); "Ask first" rules; local commands need approval
PriceIncluded in Pro ($20/month) and Max (from $100/month), on the plan's usage limitsFirst dot included in Pro ($100, $200 or $500/month) and Business Premium ($125/seat/month)Included in The X Subscription Premium ($30/month), Super ($100) and Ultra ($200), and in legacy Cursor plans
France / EUNo: US onlyPro: no (EEA, Switzerland, UK excluded); Business Premium: "all supported ChatGPT regions"No country list published; computers in the US; @bot tagging unavailable in the EU

Table sources: official pages from Anthropic, OpenAI and SpaceXSI, detailed in each section.

Claude Duet (Anthropic)

Our detailed article: Claude Duet, Anthropic's proactive agent.

OpenAI Dots

Grok Bot (SpaceXSI / Cursor)

Official sources contradict each other on Grok Bot. The launch post limited the app to desktop and iOS, with an enterprise waitlist and usage "separate" from Grok and Cursor plans (SpaceXSI). Current documentation lists macOS, Windows, Linux, iOS and Android (SpaceXSI Docs), the product page says Enterprise is "generally available" (SpaceXSI), and on The X Subscription Grok Bot draws from the same weekly pool as Cursor and the Grok apps (Cursor). Every's comparison still shows legacy Cursor plan prices ($20, $60 and $200) (Every). We go with the most recent pages.

What matters to a developer

Grok Bot is the most "technical". Its computer exposes a terminal and a filesystem, it offers a GitHub connector, and its routines can run on a schedule or on an event; the design post illustrates triggers such as a pull request being opened or checks failing (SpaceXSI). SpaceXSI cites an engineering bot that reproduces a bug in the product UI, files the ticket and hands the fix to a debugging bot (SpaceXSI). Downsides: credentials and sessions shared across all your bots, no model choice, and for teams, Cursor's model allowlist does not apply to Grok Bot (Cursor).

Dots is the closest to Codex. OpenAI describes a dot that watches customer feedback, builds and tests small fixes, then brings you pull requests with videos attached (OpenAI). It can create tasks in Codex cloud environments and, with your permission, work on your computer (OpenAI Help Center). Downsides: no access for a Pro subscriber in France, and Codex tasks use your allowance.

Claude Duet is the most coordination-oriented. Anthropic mentions prototyping and web apps, but Duet cannot see the files on your computer, can read your work in Claude without changing it, and you cannot follow its browser (Claude Help Center). For the code itself, Anthropic's tool is still Claude Code; on OpenAI's side, see our Codex page, and for Cursor, the Cursor page.

Our take

Sources

Key takeaway: all three agents work on a cloud computer and ask for approval for sensitive actions, but only Dots, through Business Premium, does not explicitly exclude Europe; Grok Bot is the best equipped for code, Claude Duet the most cautious.

Spotted an error in this article? Report it · Our corrections policy

The OrigoTech newsletter

A sourced weekly digest of AI tool news.

Read next

Security

AI-generated code: a known flaw in 45% of tasks

Veracode's 2025 GenAI Code Security Report and a METR study are reminders that speed is not enough without a change in method.

· Updated on · 3 min read